
Celeron G6900TE vs Celeron G5925

Celeron G6900TE

Celeron G5925
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900TE
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5925
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G6900TE | Celeron G5925 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($64) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G6900TE | Celeron G5925 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+331%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($64) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G6900TE and Celeron G5925

Celeron G6900TE
The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G5925
The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G6900TE and Celeron G5925 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron G6900TE is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Celeron G5925's 2,808 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G5925. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 756, a 59.7% lead for the Celeron G6900TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,457 vs 1,248 (65.3% advantage for the Celeron G6900TE). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5925.
| Feature | Celeron G6900TE | Celeron G5925 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | — |
| PassMark | 2,782 | 2,808 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,400+85% | 756 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,457+97% | 1,248 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Celeron G5925 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900TE versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5925 — the Celeron G6900TE supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900TE) vs 16 (Celeron G5925) — the Celeron G6900TE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900TE) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5925).
| Feature | Celeron G6900TE | Celeron G5925 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900TE) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5925) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget, Celeron G5925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T; Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.
| Feature | Celeron G6900TE | Celeron G5925 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 710 | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G6900TE launched at $53 MSRP, while the Celeron G5925 debuted at $62. At current prices ($64 vs $15), the Celeron G5925 is $49 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900TE delivers 43.5 pts/$ vs 187.2 pts/$ for the Celeron G5925 — making the Celeron G5925 the 124.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G6900TE | Celeron G5925 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $53-15% | $62 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $64 | $15-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.5 | 187.2+330% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














