Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482

Intel

Celeron G6900TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X5482

4 Cores4 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA771 and older memory support.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Xeon X5482 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5482 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5482, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Xeon X5482 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5482

2007

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,755 vs 2,782).
  • 328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
  • Older platform position on LGA771, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900TE better than Xeon X5482?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5482 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G6900TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G6900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $53 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X5482 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2007), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA771, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X5482

The Xeon X5482 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,755 points. Launch price was $1,279.

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5482 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5482 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5482 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon X5482 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon X5482 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Xeon X5482's 2,755 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G6900TE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5482.

FeatureCeleron G6900TEXeon X5482
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
12 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
6 MB (total)+380%
Process
10 nm-78%
45 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark
2,782
2,755
Geekbench 6 Single
1,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,457
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X5482 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G6900TEXeon X5482
Socket
LGA1700
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) / not specified (Xeon X5482). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Xeon X5482 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

FeatureCeleron G6900TEXeon X5482
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 710
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget