
Celeron G6900TE

Xeon X5482
Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G6900TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA771 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Xeon X5482 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5482 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5482, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Xeon X5482 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon X5482
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,755 vs 2,782).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA771, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G6900TE better than Xeon X5482?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X5482 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900TE
The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X5482
The Xeon X5482 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,755 points. Launch price was $1,279.
Processing Power
The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5482 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5482 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5482 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon X5482 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon X5482 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Xeon X5482's 2,755 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G6900TE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5482.
| Feature | Celeron G6900TE | Xeon X5482 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB L2 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB (total)+380% |
| Process | 10 nm-78% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,782 | 2,755 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,457 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X5482 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G6900TE | Xeon X5482 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) / not specified (Xeon X5482). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Xeon X5482 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.
| Feature | Celeron G6900TE | Xeon X5482 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 710 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













