Celeron J4115 vs A6-7310

Celeron J4115

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2019

A6-7310

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron J4115

4 / 4

2,688

0.0%

2,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7310

#158

Core i9-13900H

MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A

99%

#161

Core Ultra 7 268V

MSRP: $450|Avg: $400

98%

#162

Core Ultra 7 256V

MSRP: $450|Avg: $350

97%

#490

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

655%

#491

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

645%

#492

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

592%

#493

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

589%

#494

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

584%

#496

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

564%

#497

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

541%

#498

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

540%

#499

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

525%

#502

A6-7310

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4115 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron J4115	A6-7310
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Gemini Lake (2019) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A6-7310 (2015) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3L-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron J4115	A6-7310
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron J4115 Benchmark Check

A6-7310 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J4115 and A6-7310

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4115 and A6-7310 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Celeron J4115 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A6-7310 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the A6-7310's 2,689 — a 0% lead for the A6-7310.

Feature	Celeron J4115	A6-7310
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2048 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake (2019)	Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark	2,688	2,689

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A6-7310 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4115 versus 1600 on the A6-7310 — the Celeron J4115 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7310 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J4115) vs 1 (A6-7310). PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4115) vs 16 (A6-7310) — the A6-7310 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4115) and FT3b,FP4 (A6-7310).

Feature	Celeron J4115	A6-7310
Socket	FCBGA1090	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400+50%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	8	16+100%
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	6	16+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4115) and Radeon R4 Graphics (A6-7310) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G; A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700.