Celeron J4115
VS
A6-9400

Celeron J4115 vs A6-9400

Intel

Celeron J4115

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2019
VS
AMD

A6-9400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-9400 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron J4115 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron J4115A6-9400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Gemini Lake (2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron J4115A6-9400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J4115 and A6-9400

Intel

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A6-9400

The A6-9400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,717 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Celeron J4115 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the A6-9400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 versus 3.7 GHz on the A6-9400 — a 38.7% clock advantage for the A6-9400 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron J4115 uses the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A6-9400 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4115 scores 2,688 against the A6-9400's 2,717 — a 1.1% lead for the A6-9400.

FeatureCeleron J4115A6-9400
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz+48%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+89%
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB (total)
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Gemini Lake (2019)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,688
2,717+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4115 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A6-9400 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4115 versus DDR4-2400 on the A6-9400 — the Celeron J4115 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4115) vs 8 (A6-9400) — the A6-9400 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4115) and AMD AM4 (A6-9400).

FeatureCeleron J4115A6-9400
Socket
FCBGA1090
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400+59900%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
8
64 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
8+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4115) / not specified (A6-9400). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4115) and AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9400) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

FeatureCeleron J4115A6-9400
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true