Celeron M P4500 vs Phenom II X2 N620

Celeron M P4500 vs Phenom II X2 N620 Performance Spectrum

Celeron M P4500

2 / 2

2,533

+1.2%

2,503

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M P4500 vs Phenom II X2 N620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M P4500 vs Phenom II X2 N620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X2 N620 across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Phenom II X2 N620

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,503 vs 2,533).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M P4500 better than Phenom II X2 N620?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X2 N620 is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M P4500 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron M P4500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron M P4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M P4500 vs Phenom II X2 N620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

Phenom II X2 N620

The Phenom II X2 N620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,503 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron M P4500 and Phenom II X2 N620 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X2 N620 — a 40.3% clock advantage for the Phenom II X2 N620. The Celeron M P4500 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X2 N620 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M P4500 scores 2,533 against the Phenom II X2 N620's 2,503 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron M P4500.

Feature	Celeron M P4500	Phenom II X2 N620
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2.8 GHz+51%
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,533+1%	2,503

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X2 N620 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.