
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 235mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+143.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 680% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
CMP 30HX
2021GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 235mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+143.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 680% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 30HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 30HX scores 4,892 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 143.1%. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 11,892+143% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2560+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+79% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+2% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+10% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 2.5 MB+79% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 30HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: No vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | No | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 3.9% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-4% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 91.5+134% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 68.8% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 683.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $249-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 47.8+684% |
| Codename | TU116 | GA106 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #447 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












