EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8380

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7702P

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8380

40 Cores80 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7702P

64 / 128

63,692

+2.2%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8380

40 / 80

62,318

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅+2.2% higher PassMark.
✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 270W, a 70W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8380

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,415 less on MSRP ($2,010 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 115.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (62,318 vs 63,692).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).
❌35% higher power demand at 270W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8380 better than EPYC 7702P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8380 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P pulls ahead with 2.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7702P also has the bigger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8380 is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8380 comes in $2,415 cheaper on MSRP at $2,010 MSRP versus $4,425 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7702P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.2% better PassMark. It is also 115.4% better value on MSRP (31.0 vs 14.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8380 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7702P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7702P

The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

Xeon Platinum 8380

The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 1.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon Platinum 8380
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+60%	40 / 80
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.4 GHz+1%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+327%	60 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	63,692+2%	62,318
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	40,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702P) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the EPYC 7702P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon Platinum 8380
Socket	TR4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	6144 GB+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8380 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon Platinum 8380
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Datacenter

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7702P was priced at $4425, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($4425 vs $2010), Xeon Platinum 8380 was $2415 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the Xeon Platinum 8380 the 73.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP	$4425	$2010-55%
Performance per Dollar	14.4	31.0+115%
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7702P on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.