
EPYC 7C13
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7C13
2021Why buy it
- ✅+4.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,726 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6548Y+ across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (73,387 vs 76,363).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
EPYC 7C13
2021Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+4.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,726 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6548Y+ across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (73,387 vs 76,363).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7C13 better than Xeon Gold 6548Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 837 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 698 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 401 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 977 FPS | 946 FPS |
| medium | 886 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 761 FPS | 737 FPS |
| ultra | 659 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 753 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 481 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+

EPYC 7C13
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 73,387 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7C13 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7C13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7C13 scores 76,363 against the Xeon Gold 6548Y+'s 73,387 — a 4% lead for the EPYC 7C13. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13 vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz | 4.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+327% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 76,363+4% | 73,387 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,538 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 37,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7C13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7C13) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7C13) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 5200+129900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7C13) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6548Y+). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Gold 6548Y+ rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7C13 launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ debuted at $3726. On MSRP ($2000 vs $3726), the EPYC 7C13 is $1726 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7C13 delivers 38.2 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — making the EPYC 7C13 the 63.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7C13 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-46% | $3726 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+94% | 19.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













