EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Gold 6348

EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Gold 6348 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7F72

24 / 48

52,840

+1.9%

Ryzen 9 8945HS

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon Gold 6348

28 / 56

51,843

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Gold 6348 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Gold 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7F72

2020

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 192 MB vs 42 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Costs $1,452 less on MSRP ($2,131 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($2,131 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6348

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 235W instead of 240W, a 5W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (42 MB vs 192 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (51,843 vs 52,840).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7F72 better than Xeon Gold 6348?

Yes. EPYC 7F72 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7F72 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 192 MB versus 42 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7F72 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 357.1% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 42 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7F72 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7F72 comes in $1,452 cheaper on MSRP at $2,131 MSRP versus $3,583 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 71.4% better value on MSRP (24.8 vs 14.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6348 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Gold 6348 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F72

The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.

Xeon Gold 6348

The Xeon Gold 6348 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 235 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 51,843 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6348 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 7F72 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7F72 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the Xeon Gold 6348's 51,843 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 7F72. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	Xeon Gold 6348
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+23%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+357%	42 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	52,840+2%	51,843

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F72) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6348) — the EPYC 7F72 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6348).

Feature	EPYC 7F72	Xeon Gold 6348
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6348 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260; Xeon Gold 6348 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	Xeon Gold 6348
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7F72 was priced at $2131, while the Xeon Gold 6348 came in at $3583. On launch pricing ($2131 vs $3583), EPYC 7F72 was $1452 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F72 delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6348 — making the EPYC 7F72 the 52.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP	$2131-41%	$3583
Performance per Dollar	24.8+71%	14.5
Release Date	2020	2021

Search EPYC 7F72 on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6348 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.