
EPYC 8224P

Xeon Gold 6538N
EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6538N Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6538N FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6538N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 8224P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $2,496 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 13.4 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 205W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6538N
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (44,895 vs 45,421).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.4 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
- ❌28.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 8224P better than Xeon Gold 6538N?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8224P vs Xeon Gold 6538N Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8224P
The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

Xeon Gold 6538N
The Xeon Gold 6538N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,895 points. Launch price was $3,351.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6538N offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6538N has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6538N — a 31% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6538N (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6538N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8224P scores 45,421 against the Xeon Gold 6538N's 44,895 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 8224P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6538N.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | Xeon Gold 6538N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz+21% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+7% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 45,421+1% | 44,895 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6538N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6538N supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6538N). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8224P) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6538N) — the EPYC 8224P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8224P) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6538N).
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | Xeon Gold 6538N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 4096+256% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+20% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6538N). Direct competitor: EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon Gold 6538N rivals EPYC 9334.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | Xeon Gold 6538N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon Gold 6538N came in at $3351. On launch pricing ($855 vs $3351), EPYC 8224P was $2496 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8224P delivers 53.1 pts/$ vs 13.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6538N — making the EPYC 8224P the 119.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | Xeon Gold 6538N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $855-74% | $3351 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1+296% | 13.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















