EPYC 8224P vs Xeon w5-3435X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w5-3435X

16 Cores32 Thrd270 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon w5-3435X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8224P

24 / 48

45,421

+0.7%

Ryzen 5 8600G

Ryzen 9 8945H

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon w5-3435X

16 / 32

45,086

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon w5-3435X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon w5-3435X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
✅Costs $734 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 270W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3435X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon w5-3435X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,086 vs 45,421).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.4 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($1,589 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
❌68.8% higher power demand at 270W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8224P better than Xeon w5-3435X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w5-3435X is ahead with a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8224P pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. EPYC 8224P also has the bigger cache pool with 42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8224P comes in $734 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $1,589 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon w5-3435X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 87.2% better value on MSRP (53.1 vs 28.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 8224P vs Xeon w5-3435X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8224P

The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

Xeon w5-3435X

The Xeon w5-3435X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,086 points. Launch price was $1,589.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w5-3435X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-3435X — a 44.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3435X (base: 2.55 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w5-3435X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8224P scores 45,421 against the Xeon w5-3435X's 45,086 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 8224P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3435X.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon w5-3435X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.7 GHz+57%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz	3.1 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+42%	45 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	45,421	45,086

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3435X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon w5-3435X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8224P) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3435X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8224P) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3435X) — the Xeon w5-3435X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8224P) and W790 (Xeon w5-3435X).

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon w5-3435X
Socket	SP6	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	1152	4096+256%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	112+17%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-3435X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3435X). Direct competitor: EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon w5-3435X rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon w5-3435X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8224P was priced at $855, while the Xeon w5-3435X came in at $1589. On launch pricing ($855 vs $1589), EPYC 8224P was $734 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8224P delivers 53.1 pts/$ vs 28.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3435X — making the EPYC 8224P the 60.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8224P	Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP	$855-46%	$1589
Performance per Dollar	53.1+87%	28.4
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC 8224P on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3435X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.