EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
EPYC family
····
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······

EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

  • +154.7% higher PassMark.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
  • 300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $1,566 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
  • Delivers 126.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,127).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 8324P?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8324P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8324P is the stronger fit. You are getting 154.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in $1,566 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,895 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 8324P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 154.7% better PassMark. It is also 126.2% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 30.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8324P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.65 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 87.2% lead for the EPYC 8324P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureEPYC 8324PRyzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+300%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.4 GHz+47%
Base Clock
2.65 GHz
3.6 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+300%
32 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
57,127+155%
22,430
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 8324P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8324P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 8324P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

FeatureEPYC 8324PRyzen 7 3700X
Socket
SP6
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+50%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
1152 GB+800%
128 GB
RAM Channels
6+200%
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
96+300%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8324P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

FeatureEPYC 8324PRyzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $1566 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 77.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 8324PRyzen 7 3700X
MSRP
$1895
$329-83%
Performance per Dollar
30.1
68.2+127%
Release Date
2023
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.