EPYC 8324P
Ryzen 9 5900X
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 8324P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+46.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,346 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 57,127).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than EPYC 8324P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 8324P
The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.65 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 37.8% lead for the EPYC 8324P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+167% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 2.65 GHz | 3.7 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 57,127+47% | 38,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the EPYC 8324P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8324P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the EPYC 8324P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 GB+800% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8324P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8324P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $549), Ryzen 9 5900X was $1346 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 80.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1895 | $549-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1 | 71.0+136% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 5900X
