EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 8434P
EPYC 9175F
EPYC 8434P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8434P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) | ✅ More affordable ($3,137) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+19%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) | ✅ More affordable ($3,137) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9175F and EPYC 8434P
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
EPYC 8434P
The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 8434P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P — a 46.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 8434P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the EPYC 8434P's 66,490 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 8434P. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 48 / 96+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+61% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+68% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 512 MB (total)+300% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 65,894 | 66,490 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 8434P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus 4800 on the EPYC 8434P — the EPYC 9175F supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 6 (EPYC 8434P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9175F) vs 96 (EPYC 8434P) — the EPYC 9175F offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and SP6 (EPYC 8434P).
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+33% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+256% | 1152 |
| RAM Channels | 12+100% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9175F launched at $4256 MSRP, while the EPYC 8434P debuted at $1517. At current prices ($3703 vs $3137), the EPYC 8434P is $566 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 17.8 pts/$ vs 21.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 8434P — making the EPYC 8434P the 17.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4256 | $1517-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3703 | $3137-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.8 | 21.2+19% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9175F and EPYC 8434P
