EPYC 9175F vs EPYC 75F3
EPYC 9175F
EPYC 75F3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 75F3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) | ✅ More affordable ($2,799) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+30%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) | ✅ More affordable ($2,799) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9175F and EPYC 75F3
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 75F3 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.95 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 75F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the EPYC 75F3's 64,505 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+25% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+42% | 2.95 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 512 MB (total)+100% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 65,894+2% | 64,505 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 75F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 — the EPYC 9175F supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (EPYC 75F3). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and SP3 (EPYC 75F3).
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+100% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9175F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9175F launched at $4256 MSRP, while the EPYC 75F3 debuted at $5383. At current prices ($3703 vs $2799), the EPYC 75F3 is $904 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 17.8 pts/$ vs 23.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 75F3 — making the EPYC 75F3 the 25.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9175F | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4256-21% | $5383 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3703 | $2799-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.8 | 23.0+29% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9175F and EPYC 75F3
