
EPYC 9224

Xeon w5-2555X
EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w5-2555X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w5-2555X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w5-2555X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9224
2022Why buy it
- ✅+2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+89.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 34 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 252W, a 52W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2555X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
Xeon w5-2555X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $756 less on MSRP ($1,069 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,638 vs 48,573).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (34 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌26% higher power demand at 252W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-2555X better than EPYC 9224?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9224 vs Xeon w5-2555X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9224
The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.

Xeon w5-2555X
The Xeon w5-2555X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 252 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 47,638 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9224 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w5-2555X offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2555X — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2555X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 9224 is built on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 9224 scores 48,573 against the Xeon w5-2555X's 47,638 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 9224. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224 vs 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon w5-2555X.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+71% | 14 / 28 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+90% | 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | — |
| PassMark | 48,573+2% | 47,638 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9224 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2555X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9224) vs 8 (Xeon w5-2555X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9224) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2555X) — the EPYC 9224 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9224) and W790 (Xeon w5-2555X).
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w5-2555X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9224) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-2555X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Xeon w5-2555X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9224 was priced at $1825, while the Xeon w5-2555X came in at $1069. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $1069), Xeon w5-2555X was $756 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9224 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 44.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2555X — making the Xeon w5-2555X the 50.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1825 | $1069-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | 44.6+68% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















