EPYC 9254
Ryzen 7 5700X
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9254
2022Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 32 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($3,761 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,462 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 420.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 18,023).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9254, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9254 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9254 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9254 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 83% lead for the EPYC 9254. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,233 vs 2,116, a 5.4% lead for the EPYC 9254 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,023 vs 9,715 (59.9% advantage for the EPYC 9254). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.15 GHz | 4.6 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+300% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 64,344+142% | 26,609 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,233+6% | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,023+86% | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 9254 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9254) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 9254 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9254 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9254 was priced at $3761, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($3761 vs $299), Ryzen 7 5700X was $3462 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 135.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3761 | $299-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.1 | 89.0+420% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9254 and Ryzen 7 5700X
