EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen 5 5600

AMD

EPYC 9375F

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Ryzen family
·······

EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen 5 5600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen 5 5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen 5 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
  • 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,107 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
  • Delivers 500.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 9375F.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,600 vs 26,020).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9375F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9375F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9375F better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9375F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 32 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the stronger fit. You are getting 202.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9375F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9375F comes in 2566.3% more expensive on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600 is also 500.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 18.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9375F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9375F vs Ryzen 5 5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9375F has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 126.5% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 2,052, a 36.9% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 8,600 (100.6% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureEPYC 9375FRyzen 5 5600
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+433%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+9%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.85 GHz+10%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+700%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
95,768+344%
21,550
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,077
Geekbench 6 Single
2,981+45%
2,052
Geekbench 6 Multi
26,020+203%
8,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the EPYC 9375F supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9375F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 128 GB 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the EPYC 9375F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).

FeatureEPYC 9375FRyzen 5 5600
Socket
SP5
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000+88%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+4700%
128 GB
RAM Channels
12+500%
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+433%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E.

FeatureEPYC 9375FRyzen 5 5600
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V
Target Use
Data Center / Frequency Optimized
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the Ryzen 5 5600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $199), Ryzen 5 5600 was $5107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 142.9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9375FRyzen 5 5600
MSRP
$5306
$199-96%
Performance per Dollar
18.0
108.3+502%
Release Date
2024
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.