Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8470

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9375F

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8470

52 Cores104 Thrd350 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
Similar parts
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8470 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9375F
32 / 64
95,768
+6.6%
brand logoRyzen 9 7940HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3970X
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
Xeon Platinum 8470
52 / 104
89,850
0.0%
brand logoCore i7-6800K
brand logoCore i7-11700
brand logoCore i7-13650HX
brand logoXeon W-3275M
brand logoCore Ultra 7 255HX
brand logoXeon W-3375
brand logoXeon w7-3555
brand logoXeon w7-3565X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low315 FPS
medium290 FPS
high240 FPS
ultra204 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low191 FPS
medium172 FPS
high140 FPS
ultra114 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low725 FPS
medium618 FPS
high485 FPS
ultra421 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low282 FPS
medium250 FPS
high206 FPS
ultra169 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low923 FPS
medium748 FPS
high675 FPS
ultra572 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low854 FPS
medium773 FPS
high738 FPS
ultra649 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low1141 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high902 FPS
ultra813 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low983 FPS
medium885 FPS
high765 FPS
ultra662 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low340 FPS
medium260 FPS
high235 FPS
ultra204 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low328 FPS
medium247 FPS
high216 FPS
ultra192 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low285 FPS
medium252 FPS
high197 FPS
ultra160 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low259 FPS
medium232 FPS
high183 FPS
ultra151 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low369 FPS
medium329 FPS
high286 FPS
ultra244 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low320 FPS
medium293 FPS
high271 FPS
ultra226 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9375F
low283 FPS
medium265 FPS
high223 FPS
ultra209 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8470
low222 FPS
medium202 FPS
high174 FPS
ultra159 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅+143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
  • ✅Costs $4,053 less on MSRP ($5,306 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 88.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Platinum 8470

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (89,850 vs 95,768).
    • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($9,359 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 9375F better than Xeon Platinum 8470?
    Yes. EPYC 9375F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 21.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 9375F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9375F comes in $4,053 cheaper on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $9,359 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 88.0% better value on MSRP (18.0 vs 9.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 9375F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 52/104. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8470 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 9375F

    The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

    Intel

    Xeon Platinum 8470

    The Xeon Platinum 8470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 89,850 points. Launch price was $9,359.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8470 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon Platinum 8470's 89,850 — a 6.4% lead for the EPYC 9375F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8470.

    FeatureEPYC 9375FXeon Platinum 8470
    Cores / Threads
    32 / 64
    52 / 104+63%
    Boost Clock
    4.8 GHz+26%
    3.8 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.85 GHz+93%
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    256 MB (total)+144%
    105 MB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    2 MB (per core)+100%
    Process
    4 nm-43%
    Intel 7 nm
    Architecture
    Turin (2024)
    Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
    PassMark
    95,768+7%
    89,850
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,981
    —
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    26,020
    —
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — the EPYC 9375F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9375F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8470). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8470) — the EPYC 9375F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

    FeatureEPYC 9375FXeon Platinum 8470
    Socket
    SP5
    LGA4677
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6000+25%
    DDR5-4800
    Max RAM Capacity
    6 TB+50%
    4 TB
    RAM Channels
    12+50%
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128+60%
    80
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon Platinum 8470). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon Platinum 8470 targets Cloud Infrastructure. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon Platinum 8470 rivals EPYC 9534.

    FeatureEPYC 9375FXeon Platinum 8470
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
    Target Use
    Data Center / Frequency Optimized
    Cloud Infrastructure
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 came in at $9359. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $9359), EPYC 9375F was $4053 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8470 — making the EPYC 9375F the 61.1% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9375FXeon Platinum 8470
    MSRP
    $5306-43%
    $9359
    Performance per Dollar
    18.0+88%
    9.6
    Release Date
    2024
    2023
    Search EPYC 9375F on AmazonSearch Xeon Platinum 8470 on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.