EPYC 9384X vs EPYC 9354P
EPYC 9384X
EPYC 9354P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9384X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9354P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9384X | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) | ✅ More affordable ($2,205) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa-X (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9384X | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+96%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) | ✅ More affordable ($2,205) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9384X and EPYC 9354P
EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
EPYC 9354P
The EPYC 9354P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 74,808 points. Launch price was $2,730.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9384X and EPYC 9354P share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354P — a 2.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9384X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The EPYC 9384X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9354P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9384X scores 72,121 against the EPYC 9354P's 74,808 — a 3.7% lead for the EPYC 9354P. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354P.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.25 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+200% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 72,121 | 74,808+4% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9384X) and SP5 (EPYC 9354P).
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; EPYC 9354P rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9384X launched at $5529 MSRP, while the EPYC 9354P debuted at $2730. At current prices ($4157 vs $2205), the EPYC 9354P is $1952 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9384X delivers 17.3 pts/$ vs 33.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9354P — making the EPYC 9354P the 64.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9384X | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5529 | $2730-51% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4157 | $2205-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.3 | 33.9+96% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9384X and EPYC 9354P
