EPYC 9754 vs EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9754
EPYC 9375F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9754
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9754 | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10,631) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Bergamo (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9754 | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+9475%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10,631) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9754
The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the EPYC 9375F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F — a 43% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 2.25 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9375F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the EPYC 9375F's 95,768 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 9754. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 2,981, a 58.4% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 26,020 (42.9% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 128 / 256+300% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 3.85 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Bergamo (2023) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 98,450+3% | 95,768 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 104,584 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,634 | 2,981+82% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,825 | 26,020+55% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and SP5 (EPYC 9375F).
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Cloud Native | Data Center / Frequency Optimized |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9754 launched at $11900 MSRP, while the EPYC 9375F debuted at $5306. At current prices ($10631 vs $108), the EPYC 9375F is $10523 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 9.3 pts/$ vs 886.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9375F — making the EPYC 9375F the 195.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11900 | $5306-55% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10631 | $108-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3 | 886.7+9434% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9754 and EPYC 9375F
