FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V5800

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
139.5% HIGHER MSRP
$479 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $279 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
✅Delivers 136.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro V5800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,184 vs 1,167), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V5800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M265X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $279 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $479, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 136.1% (5.8 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M265X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V5800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5800

The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X).

Feature	FirePro V5800	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	1,184+1%	1,167
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+25%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS+38%	0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	80 KB	160 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V5800	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X.

Feature	FirePro V5800	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro V5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	FirePro V5800	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	74W-1%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	59°C	—
Perf/Watt	16.0+3%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V5800 came in at $479, while the Radeon R9 M265X launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M265X was 58.2% cheaper ($279 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V5800) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 M265X) — the Radeon R9 M265X offers 132% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M265X (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro V5800	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	$479	$200-58%
Performance per Dollar	2.5	5.8+132%
Codename	Juniper	Venus
Release	April 26 2010	March 21 2014
Ranking	#780	#839

Search FirePro V5800 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.