FirePro W7100
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7100
2014Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,065 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+112.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 903.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 112.2%. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,065 | 10,749+112% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.297 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+105% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+56% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 2.3 MB+423% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W7100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. FirePro W7100 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro W7100 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7100) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 75°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8 | 153.6+354% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7100 came in at $799, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 78.8% cheaper ($630 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (FirePro W7100) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 909.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $169-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 63.6+910% |
| Codename | Tonga | GA107 |
| Release | August 12 2014 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #406 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W7100 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
