
FirePro W8100

GeForce GTX 1060
FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W8100
2014Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,812 vs 10,064).
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+47.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1382.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 47.7%. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812 | 10,064+48% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+110% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB | 960 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W8100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. FirePro W8100 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 20% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 180W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 55.9+80% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W8100 came in at $2499, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 90% cheaper ($2250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1396.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $249-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 40.4+1396% |
| Codename | Hawaii | GP104 |
| Release | June 23 2014 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #361 | #137 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














