
FirePro W8100

Radeon RX Vega M GH
FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W8100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro W8100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
- ❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812+4% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS+15% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+67% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+67% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH carries 0 MB. FirePro W8100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 1024-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 75% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 65.5+111% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W8100 came in at $2499, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GH was 100+% cheaper ($2499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GH (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Hawaii | Polaris 22 |
| Release | June 23 2014 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #361 | #373 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














