
GeForce 6200

Quadro FX 1300
GeForce 6200 vs Quadro FX 1300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6200 vs Quadro FX 1300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6200 vs Quadro FX 1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6200
2019Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 405.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Quadro FX 1300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 6200 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Quadro FX 1300
2008Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (34 vs 37).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌364.3% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6200 vs Quadro FX 1300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

Quadro FX 1300
The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the Quadro FX 1300's 34 — the GeForce 6200 leads by 8.8%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 1300 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1300). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37+9% | 34 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS+28% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1300 carries 128 MB. GeForce 6200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1300. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6200) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1300) — the GeForce 6200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the Quadro FX 1300's 189W — a 179.9% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-95% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+1750% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce 6200 was 78.5% cheaper ($470 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1300) — the GeForce 6200 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6200 (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-78% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3+200% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GP108B | GT200B |
| Release | February 20 2019 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #643 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














