G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920A

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅1190.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 514.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1190.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2350.2% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 829), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 514.1% (50.9 vs 8.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 920A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920A

The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 920A scores 829 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 2350.2%. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	829	20,312+2350%
Architecture	Maxwell	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	384	4864+1167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	16.2 TFLOPS+2142%
Boost Clock	941 MHz	1665 MHz+77%
ROPs	8	80+900%
TMUs	24	152+533%
L1 Cache	0.19 MB	4.8 MB+2426%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 920A is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce 920A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 920A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920A and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	8 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	448 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920A) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce 920A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX	11.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)+9%
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 920A) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 920A) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce 920A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder	No	NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce 920A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP	33W-84%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-42%	600W
Power Connector	Legacy	8-pin
Length	0mm	242mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75
Perf/Watt	25.1	101.6+305%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 920A came in at $100, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 920A was 74.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 513.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 920A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP	$100-75%	$399
Performance per Dollar	8.3	50.9+513%
Codename	GM108	GA104
Release	March 13 2015	December 1 2020
Ranking	#810	#73

Search GeForce 920A on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.