GeForce 920MX vs Firepro M4100

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce 920MX

16

1,064

+0.5%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060

Firepro M4100

30

1,059

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 920MX is positioned at rank #360 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX

#350

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1020%

#352

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

925%

#353

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

923%

#357

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

839%

#358

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

833%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

100%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

99%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

95%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

94%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

93%

#372

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#373

Radeon R7 M270DX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

90%

#374

Radeon HD 6670/7670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

90%

#375

Radeon 620

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 920MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Firepro M4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 920MX	Firepro M4100
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Firepro M4100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Firepro M4100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $54), it costs 44% less, resulting in a 79.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce 920MX	Firepro M4100
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+79.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($54)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 920MX Benchmark Check

Firepro M4100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920MX and Firepro M4100

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

Firepro M4100

The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 and the Firepro M4100 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the Firepro M4100 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 384 (Firepro M4100). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100).

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Firepro M4100
G3D Mark Score	1,064	1,059
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	0.5146 TFLOPS+1%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Firepro M4100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 920MX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Firepro M4100 has 2 GB. The Firepro M4100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 0.25 MB (Firepro M4100) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Firepro M4100
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro M4100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Firepro M4100
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL11_1)
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 920MX) vs VCE 1.0 (Firepro M4100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX) vs H.264,VC-1 (Firepro M4100).

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Firepro M4100
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the Firepro M4100's 30W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 350W (Firepro M4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 920MX	Firepro M4100
TDP	16W-47%	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	82mm
Height	—	70mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	66.5+88%	35.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 920MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $54, while the Firepro M4100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The Firepro M4100 costs 44.4% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) vs 35.3 (Firepro M4100) — the Firepro M4100 offers 79.2% better value. The GeForce 920MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).