
GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce 7000M

GeForce FX 5200
Popular choices:

GeForce 7000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5200 is positioned at rank 374 and the GeForce 7000M is on rank 735, so the GeForce FX 5200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5200 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The GeForce FX 5200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 7000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 7000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 62.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5200.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-62.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+62.5%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 7000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5200 and GeForce 7000M

GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce 7000M
The GeForce 7000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce 7000M's 13 — the GeForce 7000M leads by 62.5%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce 7000M uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 384 (GeForce 7000M). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 7000M). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8 | 13+63% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+5567% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+11503% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+105% | 1176 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+2100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 680+2733% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+11111% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+9500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5200 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7000M has 256 MB. The GeForce 7000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1 MB (GeForce 7000M) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+9500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7000M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200) vs No (GeForce 7000M). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Compensation vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 7000M).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Motion Compensation | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce 7000M's 33W — a 178.3% difference. The GeForce 7000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (GeForce 7000M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 152mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 33W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 152mm | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5200 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | — |
| Codename | GB202 | GM108 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #3 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.










