GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce GT 240
Popular choices:
GeForce 9800 GTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 240 is positioned at rank 197 and the GeForce 9800 GTX is on rank 610, so the GeForce GT 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 240
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 GTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 240 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce GT 240 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800 GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9800 GTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 55.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-55.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+55.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9800 GTX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800 GTX holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $80), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 314.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+314.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 240 and GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce GT 240
The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.
GeForce 9800 GTX
The GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 769 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 240 scores 495 versus the GeForce 9800 GTX's 769 — the GeForce 9800 GTX leads by 55.4%. The GeForce GT 240 is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9800 GTX uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240) vs 224 (GeForce 9800 GTX).
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 495 | 769+55% |
| Architecture | Kepler | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+71% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 240 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9800 GTX has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 240 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 240) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9800 GTX). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240) vs No (GeForce 9800 GTX). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 240) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9800 GTX).
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 240 draws 64W versus the GeForce 9800 GTX's 150W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce GT 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 240) vs 350W (GeForce 9800 GTX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 100°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-30% | 100°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.7+51% | 5.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 240 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce 9800 GTX launched at $299 and now averages $30. The GeForce 9800 GTX costs 62.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.2 (GeForce GT 240) vs 25.6 (GeForce 9800 GTX) — the GeForce 9800 GTX offers 312.9% better value. The GeForce GT 240 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | GeForce 9800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-73% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $30-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2 | 25.6+313% |
| Codename | GK107 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | May 29 2014 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #777 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 240 and GeForce 9800 GTX
