CPU
GPU
GeForce GT 325M
Popular choices:
GeForce 8500 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 325M is positioned at rank 274 and the GeForce 8500 GT is on rank 647, so the GeForce GT 325M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8500 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 325M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8500 GT.
| Insight | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8500 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8500 GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 32.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 325M and GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce GT 325M
The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.
GeForce 8500 GT
The GeForce 8500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 325M scores 170 and the GeForce 8500 GT reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the GeForce 8500 GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 224 (GeForce 8500 GT).
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 169 |
| Architecture | Kepler | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+71% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8500 GT). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_1)+10% | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.2 | 3.3+3% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: CUDA (GeForce GT 325M) vs No (GeForce 8500 GT). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 325M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8500 GT).
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | CUDA | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the GeForce 8500 GT's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (GeForce 8500 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4+209% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8500 GT costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 11.3 (GeForce 8500 GT) — the GeForce 8500 GT offers 32.9% better value. The GeForce GT 325M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $89 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 11.3+33% |
| Codename | GK107 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | June 25 2013 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #726 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 325M and GeForce 8500 GT
