GeForce GT 325M
VS
GeForce 8600 GS

GeForce GT 325M vs GeForce 8600 GS

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

2013Core: 980 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 8600 GS

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 325M is positioned at rank 274 and the GeForce 8600 GS is on rank 658, so the GeForce GT 325M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M

#264
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
639%
#266
579%
#267
577%
#271
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
525%
#272
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
521%
#274
GeForce GT 325M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
100%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
99%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
99%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
97%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
96%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
94%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8600 GS

#648
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6065%
#650
5498%
#651
5484%
#655
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4987%
#656
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4953%
#658
GeForce 8600 GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#659
100%
#660
GeForce 9800M GTS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
100%
#661
Radeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP: $170|Avg: $15
96%
#662
Radeon HD 8280E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $110
96%
#663
Radeon R5 M420
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#664
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#665
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
93%
#666
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
#667
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
92%
#668
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#669
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
92%
#670
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
#671
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
84%
#672
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
84%
#673
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 8600 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 325M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%)
Leading raw performance (+5.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 8600 GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8600 GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 40.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+40.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 325M and GeForce 8600 GS

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8600 GS

The GeForce 8600 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 325M scores 170 versus the GeForce 8600 GS's 179 — the GeForce 8600 GS leads by 5.3%. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the GeForce 8600 GS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 224 (GeForce 8600 GS).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
G3D Mark Score
170
179+5%
Architecture
Kepler
G9x
Process Node
28 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
384+71%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 325M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8600 GS has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M) vs 10_0 (GeForce 8600 GS). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
DirectX
11 (10_1)+10%
10_0
OpenGL
3.2
3.3+3%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: CUDA (GeForce GT 325M) vs PureVideo HD (GeForce 8600 GS). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 325M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 (GeForce 8600 GS).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
Encoder
CUDA
PureVideo HD
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the GeForce 8600 GS's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (GeForce 8600 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
170mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
78°C
Perf/Watt
3.4+183%
1.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8600 GS costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 11.9 (GeForce 8600 GS) — the GeForce 8600 GS offers 40% better value. The GeForce GT 325M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MGeForce 8600 GS
MSRP
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$15-25%
Performance per Dollar
8.5
11.9+40%
Codename
GK107
NB9E-GTX
Release
June 25 2013
July 15 2008
Ranking
#726
#825