GeForce GT 325M vs GeForce Go 7900 GS
GeForce GT 325M
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7900 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 325M is positioned at rank 274 and the GeForce Go 7900 GS is on rank 383, so the GeForce GT 325M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7900 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7900 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 325M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce Go 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7900 GS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 325M and GeForce Go 7900 GS
GeForce GT 325M
The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.
GeForce Go 7900 GS
The GeForce Go 7900 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 178 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 325M scores 170 and the GeForce Go 7900 GS reaches 178 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the GeForce Go 7900 GS uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 768 (GeForce Go 7900 GS).
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce Go 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 178+5% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce Go 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 325M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7900 GS has 256 MB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce Go 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7900 GS). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce Go 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_1)+22% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.2+52% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: CUDA (GeForce GT 325M) vs No (GeForce Go 7900 GS). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 325M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7900 GS).
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce Go 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | CUDA | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the GeForce Go 7900 GS's 30W — a 50% difference. The GeForce Go 7900 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7900 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | GeForce Go 7900 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4 | 5.9+74% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 325M and GeForce Go 7900 GS
