
GeForce GTX 460 SE

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $439 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 282.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 460 SE is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2042.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 7W.
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 150W, a 143W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌274.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,947 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 SE scores 1,988 and the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 reaches 1,947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,988+2% | 1,947 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 460 SE gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 SE and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 SE draws 150W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3's 7W — a 182.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 7W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 278.1+1991% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 SE came in at $160, while the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 460 SE was 73.3% cheaper ($439 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 3.3 (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3) — the GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 275.8% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 (2018 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-73% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4+276% | 3.3 |
| Codename | GF104 | — |
| Release | November 15 2010 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #683 | #915 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















