
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs FirePro V7000

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Popular choices:

FirePro V7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 94.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+94.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti and FirePro V7000

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

FirePro V7000
The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti scores 3,080 and the FirePro V7000 reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro V7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7000). Raw compute: 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,080 | 3,162+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.263 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS+93% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+60% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7000 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 12 (FirePro V7000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 6+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti draws 160W versus the FirePro V7000's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The FirePro V7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 350W (FirePro V7000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 19.3 | 21.1+9% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro V7000 launched at $899 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.6 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) vs 31.6 (FirePro V7000) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti offers 94.9% better value. The FirePro V7000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-72% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.6+95% | 31.6 |
| Codename | GF114 | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 25 2011 | August 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #580 | #462 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















