
GeForce GTX 560 vs FirePro V9800

GeForce GTX 560
Popular choices:

FirePro V9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V9800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $250), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 745.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+745.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 and FirePro V9800

GeForce GTX 560
The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 scores 2,768 and the FirePro V9800 reaches 2,727 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro V9800 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1,280 (FirePro V9800). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,768+2% | 2,727 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 1280+281% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.089 TFLOPS | 1.856 TFLOPS+70% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+40% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V9800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V9800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 560) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | — | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 draws 150W versus the FirePro V9800's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro V9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560) vs 350W (FirePro V9800). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5+2% | 18.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro V9800 launched at $3499 and now averages $250. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 88% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) vs 10.9 (FirePro V9800) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 746.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-94% | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-88% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 92.3+747% | 10.9 |
| Codename | GF114 | Cayman |
| Release | May 17 2011 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #605 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















