GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅175.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 211.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 650 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti scores 2,525 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 211.6%. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,525 | 7,869+212% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS+109% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 896 KB+1300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 48.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 128 GB/s+48% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti draws 110W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 75W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 300W-25% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 145mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.0 | 104.9+356% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti came in at $149, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.9 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 212.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9 | 52.8+212% |
| Codename | GK106 | TU117 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #633 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650
