GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 775M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.

GeForce GTX 775M

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

GeForce GTX 775M

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than GeForce GTX 775M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,900 vs 3,837 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (75W vs 100W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013 and more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $149 MSRP. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $149 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (75W vs 100W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Is GeForce GTX 775M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 775M is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 775M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
1080p
low	26 FPS	77 FPS
medium	16 FPS	63 FPS
high	10 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	13 FPS	67 FPS
medium	7 FPS	54 FPS
high	3 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	24 FPS
medium	3 FPS	23 FPS
high	1 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce GTX 775M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
1080p
low	75 FPS	63 FPS
medium	46 FPS	42 FPS
high	34 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	19 FPS
1440p
low	35 FPS	36 FPS
medium	25 FPS	20 FPS
high	16 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	10 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	12 FPS
medium	9 FPS	7 FPS
high	7 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce GTX 775M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
1080p
low	176 FPS	173 FPS
medium	140 FPS	138 FPS
high	117 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	132 FPS	129 FPS
medium	105 FPS	104 FPS
high	88 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	86 FPS
medium	70 FPS	69 FPS
high	58 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce GTX 775M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
1080p
low	139 FPS	127 FPS
medium	112 FPS	102 FPS
high	97 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	97 FPS
medium	86 FPS	80 FPS
high	74 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	56 FPS
medium	47 FPS	44 FPS
high	36 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce GTX 775M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 775M

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 775M

The GeForce GTX 775M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 719 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,837 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GeForce GTX 775M reaches 3,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 775M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
G3D Mark Score	3,900+2%	3,837
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1344+110%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 775M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 775M) — a 85.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 775M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	160 GB/s+85%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 775M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
DirectX	12 (11_0)+9%	11_0
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 775M). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 775M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 775M
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 775M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 775M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.