G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Measures 145mm instead of 160mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅156.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 143% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌10.3% longer card at 160mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 156.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 175.6% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 3,900), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 143% (63.6 vs 26.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 175.6%. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	3,900	10,749+176%
Architecture	Maxwell	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	640	2304+260%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+388%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1470 MHz+35%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	72+80%
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	2.3 MB+642%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 94.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	168 GB/s+94%
Bus Width	128-bit+33%	96-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	75W	70W-7%
Recommended PSU	300W	300W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	160mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	65-13%	75°C
Perf/Watt	52.0	153.6+195%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti came in at $149, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 750 Ti was 11.8% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.2 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 142.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP	$149-12%	$169
Performance per Dollar	26.2	63.6+143%
Codename	GM107	GA107
Release	February 18 2014	February 2 2024
Ranking	#501	#252

Search GeForce GTX 750 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.