G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Measures 145mm instead of 160mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,900 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+175.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 143% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌10.3% longer card at 160mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Measures 145mm instead of 160mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+175.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 143% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,900 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌10.3% longer card at 160mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 3,900 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014, 175.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about 13.4% more expensive on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 175.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 750 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 750 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,900 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	33 FPS	85 FPS
medium	21 FPS	72 FPS
high	13 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	16 FPS	74 FPS
medium	9 FPS	64 FPS
high	4 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	5 FPS	27 FPS
medium	3 FPS	25 FPS
high	2 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	80 FPS	174 FPS
medium	49 FPS	149 FPS
high	36 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	37 FPS	129 FPS
medium	27 FPS	106 FPS
high	17 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	74 FPS
medium	9 FPS	62 FPS
high	8 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	176 FPS	484 FPS
medium	140 FPS	387 FPS
high	117 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	242 FPS
1440p
low	132 FPS	363 FPS
medium	105 FPS	290 FPS
high	88 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	181 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	242 FPS
medium	70 FPS	193 FPS
high	58 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	121 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	139 FPS	243 FPS
medium	112 FPS	210 FPS
high	97 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	185 FPS
medium	86 FPS	166 FPS
high	74 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	104 FPS
medium	47 FPS	87 FPS
high	36 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 175.6%. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	3,900	10,749+176%
Architecture	Maxwell	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	640	2304+260%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+388%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1470 MHz+35%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	72+80%
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	2.3 MB+642%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 94.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	168 GB/s+94%
Bus Width	128-bit+33%	96-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	75W	70W-7%
Recommended PSU	300W	300W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	160mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	65-13%	75°C
Perf/Watt	52.0	153.6+195%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti costs 11.8% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.2 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 142.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).