GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon 680M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Radeon 680M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,900 vs 3,836 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a 2014 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 680M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 680M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $149 MSRP. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 680M is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 75W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 680M make more sense than GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

Yes. Radeon 680M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 75W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 750 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 750 Ti currently gives you 1.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon 680M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	26 FPS	103 FPS
medium	16 FPS	91 FPS
high	10 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	64 FPS
1440p
low	13 FPS	89 FPS
medium	7 FPS	75 FPS
high	3 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	44 FPS
medium	3 FPS	41 FPS
high	1 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open Radeon 680M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	75 FPS	161 FPS
medium	46 FPS	128 FPS
high	34 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	35 FPS	107 FPS
medium	25 FPS	82 FPS
high	16 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	54 FPS
medium	9 FPS	43 FPS
high	7 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open Radeon 680M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	176 FPS	173 FPS
medium	140 FPS	138 FPS
high	117 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	132 FPS	129 FPS
medium	105 FPS	104 FPS
high	88 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	86 FPS
medium	70 FPS	69 FPS
high	58 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open Radeon 680M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	139 FPS	173 FPS
medium	112 FPS	138 FPS
high	97 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	129 FPS
medium	86 FPS	104 FPS
high	74 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	86 FPS
medium	47 FPS	69 FPS
high	36 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 750 Ti Open Radeon 680M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon 680M

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
G3D Mark Score	3,900+2%	3,836
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	640	768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	3.379 TFLOPS+143%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	2200 MHz+103%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	48+20%
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_2
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs VCN 3.1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	VCN 3.1
Decoder	PureVideo HD	VCN 3.1
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.