GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon 680M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon 680M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon 680M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 680M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅34.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 680M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 750 Ti instead at 3,900 vs 3,836, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 680M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 680M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon 680M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
G3D Mark Score	3,900+2%	3,836
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	640	768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	3.379 TFLOPS+143%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	2200 MHz+103%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	48+20%
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 680M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 750 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and System on the Radeon 680M.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_2
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs VCN 3.1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	VCN 3.1
Decoder	PureVideo HD	VCN 3.1
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65	—
Perf/Watt	52.0	76.7+48%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 680M (2023 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon 680M
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	GM107	Rembrandt+
Release	February 18 2014	January 3 2023
Ranking	#501	#512

Search GeForce GTX 750 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon 680M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.