
GeForce GTX 760 vs CMP 30HX

GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:

CMP 30HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 30HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The CMP 30HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The CMP 30HX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $60 for the CMP 30HX, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 96.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and CMP 30HX

GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the CMP 30HX reaches 4,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the CMP 30HX uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1,408 (CMP 30HX). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,892+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 1408+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS+111% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1785 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 96+9% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 1.4 MB+1456% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 30HX has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 (CMP 30HX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs No (CMP 30HX). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs No.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | No |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | No |
| Codecs | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the CMP 30HX's 125W — a 30.5% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (CMP 30HX). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 125W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3 | 39.1+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the CMP 30HX launched at $799 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 760 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 160.4 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 81.5 (CMP 30HX) — the GeForce GTX 760 offers 96.8% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-50% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 160.4+97% | 81.5 |
| Codename | GK104 | TU116 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #450 | #447 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











