GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 760 is significantly newer (2013 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 760 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 760 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 768MB.

Insight	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	Fermi (2010−2014) (Standard Node)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 760 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460 768MB Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the GeForce GTX 460 768MB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB uses Fermi. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
G3D Mark Score	4,813	4,800
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Shading Units	1152+243%	336

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) — a 122.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+122%	86.4 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.3	4.6+7%
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
TDP	170W	75W-56%
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	2x 6-pin
Length	241mm	210mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	28.3	64.0+126%