GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID K240Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID K240Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID K240Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $341 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 221.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
214.5% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 950A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (2,599 vs 2,541), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 950A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 950A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $341 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 221.6% (16.3 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 950A vs GRID K240Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the GRID K240Q reaches 2,541 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID K240Q
G3D Mark Score	2,599+2%	2,541
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS+59%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K240Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID K240Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950A and 64-bit on the GRID K240Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID K240Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	DDR3	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID K240Q
TDP	75W-67%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	34.7+207%	11.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 950A came in at $159, while the GRID K240Q launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950A was 68.2% cheaper ($341 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 5.1 (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 219.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950A (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GRID K240Q
MSRP	$159-68%	$500
Performance per Dollar	16.3+220%	5.1
Codename	GM107	GK104
Release	March 13 2015	June 28 2013
Ranking	#621	#628

Search GeForce GTX 950A on Amazon

Search GRID K240Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.