
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,133 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 55% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 960
2015GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 55% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,133 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 960?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 93.9%. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 11,892+94% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+272% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1755 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2.5 MB+558% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 960 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 224 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 91.5+49% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 55.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-20% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8 | 47.8+55% |
| Codename | GM206 | GA106 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #393 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













