G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

2014

Why buy it

✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
66.8% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅126.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 389.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 126.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 193.3% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 9,177), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX TITAN Black is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 389.2% (44.9 vs 9.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 193.3%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	9,177	26,919+193%
Architecture	Kepler	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2880	5888+104%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.645 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+416%
Boost Clock	980 MHz	2475 MHz+153%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	240+30%	184
L1 Cache	0.23 MB	5.8 MB+2422%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	36 MB+2300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN Black is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	12 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s	504 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	384-bit+100%	192-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	36 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12.0	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	NVENC 1.0	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	250W	200W-20%
Recommended PSU	600W-8%	650W
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	8-pin
Length	267mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	36.7	134.6+267%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black came in at $999, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 388% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP	$999	$599-40%
Performance per Dollar	9.2	44.9+388%
Codename	GK110B	AD104
Release	February 18 2014	April 12 2023
Ranking	#288	#32

Search GeForce GTX TITAN Black on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.