GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon R9 390
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon R9 390 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon R9 390 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon R9 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 390 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌203.6% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅9.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 193% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.9 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon R9 390 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon R9 390
The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Radeon R9 390 reaches 8,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 390). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177+4% | 8,855 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+13% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS+10% | 5.12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1000 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 640 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 390 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 390 carries 8 GB. Radeon R9 390 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 390) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 390. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+5% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 512-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 390). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 390's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-16% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7+24% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black came in at $999, while the Radeon R9 390 launched at $329. On MSRP, Radeon R9 390 was 67.1% cheaper ($670 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 26.9 (Radeon R9 390) — the Radeon R9 390 offers 192.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 390 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $329-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 26.9+192% |
| Codename | GK110B | Grenada |
| Release | February 18 2014 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #288 | #296 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN Black and Radeon R9 390
