
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1104.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅24.8% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1525.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅24.8% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1525.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1104.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Z still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 35%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 11,892+35% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+125% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 8.986 TFLOPS+78% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1755 MHz+100% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+200% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 2.5 MB+987% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN Z is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 1400.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 97% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 130W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 450W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 91.5+289% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 91.7% less ($2750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1548.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $249-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 47.8+1548% |
| Codename | GK110B | GA106 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #300 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













