GeForce MX150
VS
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

GeForce MX150 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

NVIDIA

GeForce MX150

2017Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX150 is positioned at rank #304 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX150

#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
100%
#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
93%
#293
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
723%
#295
656%
#296
654%
#300
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
595%
#301
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
591%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
100%
#306
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#307
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
98%
#308
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
98%
#311
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
95%
#313
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
94%
#314
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce MX150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).

InsightGeForce MX150UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX150 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX150 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

NVIDIA

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses Gen. 12, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX150UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
G3D Mark Score
2,252+2%
2,200
Architecture
Pascal
Gen. 12
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384+1100%
32
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1450 MHz+40%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce MX150UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX150 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The GeForce MX150 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce MX150UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce MX150UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce MX150) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150) vs AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).

FeatureGeForce MX150UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Encoder
No
Quick Sync Video (Xe)
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
Quick Sync Video (Xe)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1
AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 40% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce MX150UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
TDP
10W-33%
15W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Mobile
Integrated
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
225.2+54%
146.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX150 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.5 (GeForce MX150) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce MX150UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
MSRP
$150
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$60
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
37.5
Infinity
Codename
GP108
Rocket Lake Xe
Release
May 17 2017
March 30 2021
Ranking
#657
#809