
GeForce MX150
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX150 is positioned at rank #304 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX150
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce MX150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX150 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX150 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

GeForce MX150
The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses Gen. 12, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,252+2% | 2,200 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+1100% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1450 MHz+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX150 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The GeForce MX150 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce MX150) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150) vs AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 | AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 40% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-33% | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 225.2+54% | 146.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX150 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.5 (GeForce MX150) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108 | Rocket Lake Xe |
| Release | May 17 2017 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #657 | #809 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













