GeForce MX150
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
GeForce MX150 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX150 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce MX150 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX150 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce MX150
The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX150 scores 2,252 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX150 is built on Pascal while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses Gen. 12, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX150) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,252+2% | 2,200 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+1100% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1450 MHz+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX150 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX150 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) carries 0 MB. GeForce MX150 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX150 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce MX150) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150) vs AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 | AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX150 draws 10W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 40% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX150) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-33% | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 225.2+54% | 146.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX150 came in at $150, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX150) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX150 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108 | Rocket Lake Xe |
| Release | May 17 2017 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #657 | #809 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX150 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
