GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4070

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX350

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 20W instead of 200W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅615.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 297.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌900% higher power demand at 200W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 615.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 851.9% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 2,828), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce MX350 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 297.3% (44.9 vs 11.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 851.9%. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	2,828	26,919+852%
Architecture	Pascal	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	14 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	640	5888+820%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.199 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+2331%
Boost Clock	937 MHz	2475 MHz+164%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	184+475%
L1 Cache	0.23 MB	5.8 MB+2422%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	36 MB+7100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce MX350 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX350 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX350 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 56 GB/s (GeForce MX350) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 800% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX350 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	12 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	56 GB/s	504 GB/s+800%
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	36 MB+7100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	20W-90%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-46%	650W
Power Connector	Mobile	8-pin
Length	—	304mm
Height	—	137mm
Slots	—	3
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.4+5%	134.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX350 came in at $250, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce MX350 was 58.3% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce MX350) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 297.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2020).

Feature	GeForce MX350	GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP	$250-58%	$599
Performance per Dollar	11.3	44.9+297%
Codename	GP107	AD104
Release	February 10 2020	April 12 2023
Ranking	#597	#32

Search GeForce MX350 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.